22nd, December 2020 (4 months ago)
Cryptocurrency
These are the primary yield aggregator and liquidity provider protocol platforms that I am currently making use of, based on my current testing and evaluation methodology. I have taken into account yield and risk, but strategies are subject to change, since this space is moving so fast. New protocol products are constantly being released, and older ones become lower layer financial primitives (or otherwise fade away).
Introduction
These are the primary yield aggregator and liquidity provider protocol platforms that I am currently making use of, based on my current testing and evaluation methodology. I have taken into account yield and risk, but strategies are subject to change, since this space is moving so fast. New protocol products are constantly being released, and older ones become lower layer financial primitives (or otherwise fade away). I am currently focusing on eth based projects, but also 3 scaling solutions. Two are side (or sister chains) and the other is an Eth L2 solution to provide more speed, and lower fees. This will continue to develop, and many new solutions are being introduced on eth and also other chains as well. It is important to weigh the advantages and disadvantages before making a decision. But the scaling solutions are more forgiving to mis-steps, testing, and smaller amounts since the fees are so low, and the transactions are so fast. You can easily change your mind, or chase better rates if they crop up somewhere else since the cost to move things around is so low. On the other hand, eth still has the most mature platforms which have been battle tested, and the most liquidity for trading etc. One of the criteria that I use for testing/evaluation is that the project must be live on mainnet. There are many promising projects that I am following, but cannot do an adequate evaluation without testing the live mainnet version. I have also done some testing on the Xdai L2 solution, and the Tron chain, but I decided to focus on the ones below for various reasons. Of course this could change in the future, as development and adoption increases.
Eth (main benefit is maturity, liquidity and breadth of alternatives)
BSC (main benefit is faster, cheaper, and coins from other chains are supported)
There is very little cost to switching, if rates are better on another defi service since network fees are so low. That is the main advantage of scaled solutions vs. eth.
Add BSC to metamask networks: Click on network (where it says eth mainnet), Select ‘Custom RPC’
Enter in the BSC mainnet details as follows:
Network Name: BSC Mainnet
New RPC URL: https://bsc-dataseed1.binance.org/
ChainID: 56
Symbol: BNB
Block Explorer URL: https://bscscan.com/
Then press “Save”
Matic (L2 solution for eth with faster speeds, and lower fees)
To configure metamask - Enter in the following information and click Save:

Kava/Cosmos (connect using Trust wallet)
Conclusion
This represents a good sample of the current generation of defi protocols. There are many new Defi protocols in various stages of development. Here is an article on some of the most promising defi projects being built on Polkadot. Here are a few more on other platforms- yAxis, Alpha Homora, Venus, Bella, Acropolis, and many more. But they are not live yet. When they are I will start testing, evaluating, and comparing.
For the next generation I see more cross platform support, so that optimised strategies can produce the best overall yields and rates across chains. This will be a "meta" yield aggregation level above the current yield aggregators on individual chains. The primary feature of the next generation of Defi yield aggregators will be interoperability. The space continues to evolve, mature, and grow in terms to total locked-in value (see Dapp Radar).
So, let me know what your favourites are, and why, and what you expect to see in the future.
Share:
twitter facebook linkedin redditYou MUST be logged in to like, dislike and comment on this post
Featured
cberry
16 Dec
9 0 $0.933312
cberry
03 Dec
50 0 $1.42
Trending
US needs to take leadership on central bank digital currencies: former CFTC chair
Brylant
03 May
1 0 $0
Will Elon Musk’s ‘SNL’ Appearance Send Dogecoin to the Moon? Curb Your Enthusiasm
Brylant
06 May
1 0 $0
Highest Earning
US needs to take leadership on central bank digital currencies: former CFTC chair
Brylant
03 May
1 0 $0
Will Elon Musk’s ‘SNL’ Appearance Send Dogecoin to the Moon? Curb Your Enthusiasm
Brylant
06 May
1 0 $0
US needs to take leadership on central bank digital currencies: former CFTC chair
Brylant
03 May
1 0 $0
Will Elon Musk’s ‘SNL’ Appearance Send Dogecoin to the Moon? Curb Your Enthusiasm
Brylant
06 May
1 0 $0
US needs to take leadership on central bank digital currencies: former CFTC chair
Brylant
03 May
1 0 $0
Will Elon Musk’s ‘SNL’ Appearance Send Dogecoin to the Moon? Curb Your Enthusiasm
Brylant
06 May
1 0 $0